<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Outsourcing Practices, Redux</title>
	<atom:link href="http://qahatesyou.com/wordpress/2008/11/outsourcing-practices-redux/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://qahatesyou.com/wordpress/2008/11/outsourcing-practices-redux/</link>
	<description>You suspected it.  Now you know it.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 15 May 2012 21:22:45 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: blrincker</title>
		<link>http://qahatesyou.com/wordpress/2008/11/outsourcing-practices-redux/comment-page-1/#comment-104</link>
		<dc:creator>blrincker</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Dec 2008 08:09:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://qahatesyou.com/wordpress/2008/11/05/outsourcing-practices-redux/#comment-104</guid>
		<description>Mr. Director - I agree with this article - although let&#039;s acknowledge that offshoring can be done effectively.  The key, of course, is an onshore developer who can manage the offshore guys/gals.

It&#039;s not always a sure thing, of course, but used effectively. I&#039;d maintain that you can save a lot... maybe 50%? best case? by offshoring.

Please tell me if you disagree- I&#039;ve never known your stance on offshoring dev work.   At the same time I&#039;m not sure you&#039;ve know the financials.  Let&#039;s just assume the offshore bill rate is 20% of the onshore. In other words, 5 offshore = 1 onshore.

Is it cost effective?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Mr. Director &#8211; I agree with this article &#8211; although let&#8217;s acknowledge that offshoring can be done effectively.  The key, of course, is an onshore developer who can manage the offshore guys/gals.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s not always a sure thing, of course, but used effectively. I&#8217;d maintain that you can save a lot&#8230; maybe 50%? best case? by offshoring.</p>
<p>Please tell me if you disagree- I&#8217;ve never known your stance on offshoring dev work.   At the same time I&#8217;m not sure you&#8217;ve know the financials.  Let&#8217;s just assume the offshore bill rate is 20% of the onshore. In other words, 5 offshore = 1 onshore.</p>
<p>Is it cost effective?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

