<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: I&#8217;ll Take That Cheap Shot</title>
	<atom:link href="http://qahatesyou.com/wordpress/2009/06/ill-take-that-cheap-shot/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://qahatesyou.com/wordpress/2009/06/ill-take-that-cheap-shot/</link>
	<description>You suspected it.  Now you know it.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 15 May 2012 21:22:45 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Director</title>
		<link>http://qahatesyou.com/wordpress/2009/06/ill-take-that-cheap-shot/comment-page-1/#comment-163</link>
		<dc:creator>The Director</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Jun 2009 12:53:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://qahatesyou.com/wordpress/2009/06/01/ill-take-that-cheap-shot/#comment-163</guid>
		<description>It does make SQA all too easy that they never learn.  We never have to find new tricks because the developers fall for the old ones.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It does make SQA all too easy that they never learn.  We never have to find new tricks because the developers fall for the old ones.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: pberry</title>
		<link>http://qahatesyou.com/wordpress/2009/06/ill-take-that-cheap-shot/comment-page-1/#comment-162</link>
		<dc:creator>pberry</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Jun 2009 08:29:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://qahatesyou.com/wordpress/2009/06/01/ill-take-that-cheap-shot/#comment-162</guid>
		<description>It&#039;s Web Form Testing 101 though isn&#039;t it? Don&#039;t touch the form, just click [Sumbit] and observe. You&#039;d think developers would be wise to our tricks by now.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s Web Form Testing 101 though isn&#8217;t it? Don&#8217;t touch the form, just click [Sumbit] and observe. You&#8217;d think developers would be wise to our tricks by now.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Isarian</title>
		<link>http://qahatesyou.com/wordpress/2009/06/ill-take-that-cheap-shot/comment-page-1/#comment-161</link>
		<dc:creator>Isarian</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Jun 2009 20:07:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://qahatesyou.com/wordpress/2009/06/01/ill-take-that-cheap-shot/#comment-161</guid>
		<description>Then I&#039;ve been suckered - my boss has offloaded problem discovery, diagnosis, and patch testing on me. I would mind this less if the developers bothered testing their own changes, especially our web front-end developer, as I find browser-specific bugs that would have easily been exposed by a little leg work regularly.

Now to go fake a cortical brain injury...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Then I&#8217;ve been suckered &#8211; my boss has offloaded problem discovery, diagnosis, and patch testing on me. I would mind this less if the developers bothered testing their own changes, especially our web front-end developer, as I find browser-specific bugs that would have easily been exposed by a little leg work regularly.</p>
<p>Now to go fake a cortical brain injury&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Director</title>
		<link>http://qahatesyou.com/wordpress/2009/06/ill-take-that-cheap-shot/comment-page-1/#comment-160</link>
		<dc:creator>The Director</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Jun 2009 17:22:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://qahatesyou.com/wordpress/2009/06/01/ill-take-that-cheap-shot/#comment-160</guid>
		<description>You&#039;re doing QA wrong.  You find the problems, you don&#039;t diagnose them.  Otherwise you&#039;ll let on to the developers that maybe we&#039;re not dumber than a sack of dull hammers.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You&#8217;re doing QA wrong.  You find the problems, you don&#8217;t diagnose them.  Otherwise you&#8217;ll let on to the developers that maybe we&#8217;re not dumber than a sack of dull hammers.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Isarian</title>
		<link>http://qahatesyou.com/wordpress/2009/06/ill-take-that-cheap-shot/comment-page-1/#comment-159</link>
		<dc:creator>Isarian</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Jun 2009 16:09:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://qahatesyou.com/wordpress/2009/06/01/ill-take-that-cheap-shot/#comment-159</guid>
		<description>Interestingly enough, they DO validate actual input (&quot;You Fail It&quot; does not work), but DO NOT validate the field when it is empty. I wonder if they are sanitizing this input in other ways...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Interestingly enough, they DO validate actual input (&#8220;You Fail It&#8221; does not work), but DO NOT validate the field when it is empty. I wonder if they are sanitizing this input in other ways&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

