Archive for the ‘Failed e-mails’ Category

Sending the Wrong Message

Tuesday, June 24th, 2008 by The Director

Kohl’s is running another sweepstakes, and this one includes an object lesson about testing ancillary elements of your promotions.

The problem doesn’t lie with the form itself; you fill it out, and on the thank you for entering page it allows you to send a friend a link to the sweepstakes.  That’s becoming pretty standard fare, and I didn’t get an error with the tell-a-friend form.

However.

(more…)

The Star Must Mean The Image Is Important

Tuesday, June 3rd, 2008 by The Director

A Men’s Wearhouse e-mail apparently indicates this image is important by giving the image an asterisk as its alt text:

You're gonna like how this image looks in a screen reader
Click for full size

As a reminder, if you don’t want to include alt text with an image, the proper and Section 508 compliant way to do so is with an empty alt attribute, not with random characters in it.

 

Cut and Paste Happens

Thursday, May 22nd, 2008 by The Director

Sometimes, even well-intentioned designers and developers errantly use the old cut-and-paste trick to replicate existing things, such as table rows in layouts such as we see in this e-mail:

That alt text would be correct if only it was not actually incorrect.
Click for full size

Sadly, though, even well-intentioned designers and developers are only designers and developers. In this case, no doubt the person cloned the first row in the table and used it as a microtemplate for all others in the table. Unfortunately, that person forgot to change the alt text for the Gifts image.

That’s why you have to test every thing, every time, QAsmonauts. Because this time it’s the alt text, but next time it could be the image filename (resulting in the wrong image or a broken image) or it could be the target of the link.

Disney E-mail Goes The Extra Mile, Gets Lost

Wednesday, April 2nd, 2008 by The Director

You have to hand it to the people responsible for the Disney Movie Rewards e-mails. They just try harder.

The basic e-mail has the normal, if you can’t see it, click to see it on the Web link:

The normal click here to view as Web page link.
Click for full size

And that view as Web page is wise enough to remove the View as Web page link (a pet peeve of mine, as you know: the “View as Web page” link on the actual Web page that the user views when viewing an e-mail as a Web page). The Disney interactive marketing team and its e-mail vendor go the extra mile, though, and put a special link on that Web page instead:

Click here if you're still having trouble
Click for full size

Awesome. I love it when they go that extra step. And fail:

The page could not be named more appropriately.
Click for full size

A page entitled Marketer Error Page with nothing on it.

It could not be named more appropriately.

You know what The Director does when he’s running through the test e-mails, sometimes called “friendlies” because they’re sent to a list of known people for testing? He clicks every link in the e-mail. And you know what he does when he clicks the View as Web page link? He clicks every link on the Web page.

Often you’ll find that tracking information is missing or whatnot, but every once in again, you get the good stuff.

I should make a special category called Disney to collect all the pro bono work I’m doing for the company.

Text Is So Limiting

Monday, March 10th, 2008 by The Director

This confirmation e-mail rendered in text has one thing going for it: The composers knew that the trademark and the registered trademark symbols don’t render correctly, so they replaced those symbols with ™ and (r) respectively.

Too bad nobody thought about the smart apostrophe in Tony’s(r).

A smart apostrophe makes you look dumb
Click for full size

Remember, if you’re using Microsoft Word or other popular programs, the applications will replace straight quotes in the copy with smart quotes, and most people are not smart enough to know the difference. You, fellow QAer, must.

Reminder About Those Smart Quotes

Tuesday, February 12th, 2008 by The Director

Dear e-mail campaign designer, please remember that smart quotation marks and smart apostrophes (as well as other special characters like em dashes) do not render properly in text only e-mails.

Ergo, say you’re putting together a tell-a-friend e-mail such as the one found on the Lost Sawyer’s Nickname Generator. You should probably take a little more care when copying the text from your word processor to make sure that you replace the apostrophe:

I know the answer; it's a smart apostrophe!
Click for full size

You could also do a little testing on it, too, but that’s probably too much to ask.

They Probably Couldn’t Find It In The Dictionary

Monday, December 17th, 2007 by The Director

If they tried to look professional up in the dictionary the way they spelled it in the alt text, GMC wouldn’t find it:

Professional Grade: F
Click for full size

 

You can guess what professional grade I give them for sloppy quality.

Making the Least of Opt Out

Friday, November 16th, 2007 by The Director

I get e-mails because I once signed up for KCStar.com so I could read an article there. I might have opted out once or twice before; I know I’ve tried to opt-out of the Twin Cities Star several times, but like a drunk-dialing ex, they keep ringing me up with ludicrous offers hundreds of miles from me.

So I tried to opt out of the e-mails via the latest offer from KCStar.com, an offer targeted to KU and MU (that’s University of Missouri-Columbia, not really an MU like my alma mater). Here’s the link in the e-mail:

Kansas City Star e-mail
Click for full size
What would you expect that to take you to? Not where it takes you.
(more…)

Almost An Insult

Wednesday, October 10th, 2007 by The Director

If I were an e-mail marketer, I would almost be insulted:

Sleezy
Click for full size
Of course, it’s hard to be insulted by an e-mail marketing communication rife with typos and a Web site rife with errors.

I realize I single out BizJournals.com a lot, but geez, the quality of its e-mails and its Web site are atrocious and worthy of scorn.

Nor Proofreaders, Apparently

Wednesday, August 1st, 2007 by The Director

The working wold is no place for wimps, spellcheckers

Oh, We Did?

Wednesday, July 18th, 2007 by The Director

This is Web 2.0 at its finest:

The Royal We

Oh, we have, have we?

Somehow, I suspect if you had encountered the error, I would not have encountered the error. Or at least I would hope so.

It’s Web 2.0, though, because we encountered the error together, and I am invited to freely contribute to the community by submitting a bug report.

That’s No Way To Mail Merge, Son

Monday, July 9th, 2007 by The Director

It must be difficult running weekly e-mails and all, but someone should probably review the friendlies to make sure that your variable names aren’t coming through instead of, oh, I don’t know, values:

That was my name, until I had it legally changed to QA